Newsletters

The IRS has provided details clarifying the federal tax status involving special payments made by 21 states in 2022. Taxpayers in many states will not need to report these payments on their 2022 tax returns.

The IRS has provided details clarifying the federal tax status involving special payments made by 21 states in 2022. Taxpayers in many states will not need to report these payments on their 2022 tax returns.

General welfare and disaster relief payments

If a payment is made for the promotion of the general welfare or as a disaster relief payment, for example related to the COVID 19 pandemic, it may be excludable from income for federal tax purposes under the General Welfare Doctrine or as a Qualified Disaster Relief Payment. Payments from the following states fall in this category and the IRS will not challenge the treatment of these payments as excludable for federal income tax purposes in 2022:

• California,

• Colorado,

• Connecticut,

• Delaware,

• Florida,

• Hawaii,

• Idaho,

• Illinois,

• Indiana,

• Maine,

• New Jersey,

• New Mexico,

• New York,

• Oregon,

• Pennsylvania, and

• Rhode Island.

Alaska is in this group only for the supplemental Energy Relief Payment received in addition to the annual Permanent Fund Dividend. Illinois and New York issued multiple payments and in each case one of the payments was a refund of taxes to which the above treatment applies, and one of the payments is in the category of disaster relief payment. A list of payments to which the above treatment applies is available on the IRS website.

Refund of state taxes paid

If the payment is a refund of state taxes paid and recipients either claimed the standard deduction or itemized their deductions but did not receive a tax benefit (for example, because the $10,000 tax deduction limit applied) the payment is not included in income for federal tax purposes. Payments from the following states in 2022 fall in this category and will be excluded from income for federal tax purposes unless the recipient received a tax benefit in the year the taxes were deducted.

• Georgia,

• Massachusetts,

• South Carolina, and

• Virginia

Other Payments

Other payments that may have been made by states are generally includable in income for federal income tax purposes. This includes the annual payment of Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend and any payments from states provided as compensation to workers.

The IRS intends to change how it defines vans, sports utility vehicles (SUVs), pickup trucks and “other vehicles” for purposes of the Code Sec. 30D new clean vehicle credit. These changes are reflected in updated IRS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the new, previously owned and commercial clean vehicle credits.

The IRS intends to change how it defines vans, sports utility vehicles (SUVs), pickup trucks and “other vehicles” for purposes of the Code Sec. 30D new clean vehicle credit. These changes are reflected in updated IRS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the new, previously owned and commercial clean vehicle credits.

Clean Vehicle Classification Changes

For a vehicle to qualify for the new clean vehicle credit, its manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) cannot exceed:

• $80,000 for a van, SUV or pickup truck; or

• $55,000 for any other vehicle.

In December, the IRS announced that proposed regulations would define these vehicle types by reference to the general definitions provided in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations in 40 CFR 600.002 (Notice 2023-1).

However, the IRS has now determined that these vehicles should be defined by reference to the fuel economy labeling rules in 40 CFR 600.315-08. This change means that some vehicles that were formerly classified as “other vehicles” subject to the $55,000 price cap are now classified as SUVs subject to the $80,000 price cap.

Until the IRS releases proposed regulations for the new clean vehicle credit, taxpayers may rely on the definitions provided in Notice 2023-1, as modified by today’s guidance. These modified definitions are reflected in the Clean Vehicle Qualified Manufacturer Requirements page on the IRS website, which lists makes and models that may be eligible for the clean vehicle credits.

Expected Definitions of Vans, SUVs, Pickup Trucks and Other Vehicles

The EPA fuel economy standards establish a large category of nonpassenger vehicles called “light trucks.” Within this category, vehicles are defined largely by their gross vehicle weight ratings (GVWR) as follows:

• Vans, including minivans

• Pickup trucks, including small pickups with a GVWR below 6,000 pounds, and standard pickups with a GVWR between 6,000 and 8,500 pounds

• SUVs, including small SUVs with a GVWR below 6.000 pounds, and standard SUVs with a GVWR between 6,000 and 10,000 pounds

• Other vehicles (passenger automobiles) that, based on seating capacity of interior volume, are classified as two-seaters; mini-compact, subcompact, compact, midsize, or large cars; and small, midsize, or large station wagons.

However, the EPA may determine that a particular vehicle is more appropriately placed in a different category. In particular, the EPA may determine that automobiles with GVWR of up to 8,500 pounds and medium-duty passenger vehicles that possess special features are more appropriately classified as “special purpose vehicles.” These special features may include advanced technologies, such as battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and vehicles equipped with hydrogen internal combustion engines.

FAQ Updates

The IRS also updated its frequently asked questions (FAQs) page for the Code Sec. 30D new clean vehicle credit, the Code Sec. 25E previously owned vehicle credit and the Code Sec. 45W qualified commercial clean vehicles credit. In addition to incorporating the new definitions discussed above, these updates:

• Define “original use” and "MSRP;"

• Describe the information a seller must provide to the taxpayer and the IRS;

• Clarify that the MSRP caps apply to a vehicle placed in service (delivered to the taxpayer) in 2023, even if the taxpayer purchased it in 2022; and

• Explain what constitutes a lease.

Effect on Other Documents

Notice 2023-1 is modified. Taxpayers may rely on the definitions provided in Notice 2023-1, as modified by Notice 2023-16, until the IRS releases proposed regulations for the new clean vehicle credit.

The IRS established the program to allocate environmental justice solar and wind capacity limitation (Capacity Limitation) to qualified solar and wind facilities eligible for the Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program component of the energy investment credit.

The IRS established the program to allocate environmental justice solar and wind capacity limitation (Capacity Limitation) to qualified solar and wind facilities eligible for the Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program component of the energy investment credit. The IRS also provided:

• initial guidance regarding the overall program design ,

• the application process, and

• additional criteria that will be considered in making the allocations.

After the 2023 allocation process begins, the Treasury Department and IRS will monitor and assess whether to implement any modifications to the Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program for calendar year 2024 allocations of Capacity Limitation.

Facility Categories, Capacity Limits, and Application Dates

The program establishes four facilities categories and the capacity limitation for each:

The IRS anticipates applications will be accepted for Category 3 and Category 4 facilities in the third quarter of 2023. Applications for Category 1 and Category 2 facilities will be accepted thereafter. The IRS will issue additional guidance regarding the application process and facility eligibility.

The program will also incorporate additional criteria in determining how to allocate the Capacity Limitation reserved for each facility category among eligible applicants. These may include a focus on facilities that are owned or developed by community-based organizations and mission-driven entities, have an impact on encouraging new market participants, provide substantial benefits to low-income communities and individuals marginalized from economic opportunities, and have a higher degree of commercial readiness.

Finally, only the owner of a facility may apply for an allocation of Capacity Limitation. Facilities placed in service prior to being awarded an allocation of Capacity Limitation are not eligible to receive an allocation. The Department of Energy (DOE) will provide administration services for the Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program. An allocation of an amount of capacity limitation is not a determination that the facility will qualify for the energy investment credit or the increase in the credit under the Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program.

The IRS announced a program to allocate $10 billion of credits for qualified investments in eligible qualifying advanced energy projects (the Code Sec. 48C(e) program). At least $4 billion of these credits may be allocated only to projects located in certain energy communities.

The IRS announced a program to allocate $10 billion of credits for qualified investments in eligible qualifying advanced energy projects (the Code Sec. 48C(e) program). At least $4 billion of these credits may be allocated only to projects located in certain energy communities.

The guidance announcing the program also:

• defines key terms, including qualifying advanced energy project, specified advanced energy property, eligible property, the placed in service date, industrial facility, manufacturing facilities, and recycling facility;

• describes the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements, along with remediation options; and

• sets forth the program timeline and the steps the taxpayer must follow.

Application and Certification Process

For Round 1 of the Section 48C(e) program, the application period begins on May 31, 2023. The IRS expects to allocate $4 billion in credit in this round, including $1.6 billion to projects in energy communities.

The taxpayer must submit a concept paper detailing the project by July 31, 2023. The taxpayer must also certify under penalties of perjury that it did not claim a credit under several other Code Sections for the same investment.

Within two years after the IRS accepts an allocation application, the taxpayer must submit evidence to the DOE to establish that it has met all requirements necessary to commence construction of the project. DOE then notifies the IRS, and the IRS certifies the project.

Taxpayers generally submit their papers through the Department of Energy (DOE) eXHANGE portal at https://infrastructure-exchange.energy.gov/. The DOE must recommend and rank the project to the IRS, and have a reasonable expectation of its commercial viability.

Energy Communities and Progress Expenditures

The guidance also provides additional procedures for energy communities and the credit for progress expenditures.

For purposes of the minimum $4 billion allocation for projects in energy communities, the DOE will determine which projects are in energy community census tracts. Additional guidance is expected to provide a mapping tool that applicants for allocations may use to determine if their projects are in energy communities.

Finally, the guidance explains how taxpayers may elect to claim the credit for progress expenditures paid or incurred during the tax year for construction of a qualifying advanced energy project. The taxpayer cannot make the election before receiving its certification letter.

The IRS has released new rules and conditions for implementing the real estate developer alternative cost method. This is an optional safe harbor method of accounting for real estate developers to determine when common improvement costs may be included in the basis of individual units of real property in a real property development project held for sale to determine the gain or loss from sales of those units.

The IRS has released new rules and conditions for implementing the real estate developer alternative cost method. This is an optional safe harbor method of accounting for real estate developers to determine when common improvement costs may be included in the basis of individual units of real property in a real property development project held for sale to determine the gain or loss from sales of those units.

Background

Under Code Sec. 461, developers cannot add common improvement costs to the basis of benefitted units until the costs are incurred under the Code Sec. 461(h) economic performance requirements. Thus, common improvement costs that have not been incurred under Code Sec. 461(h) when the units are sold cannot be included in the units' basis in determining the gain or loss resulting from the sales. Rev. Proc. 92-29, provided procedures under which the IRS would consent to developers including the estimated cost of common improvements in the basis of units sold without meeting the economic performance requirements of Code Sec. 461(h). In order to use the alternative cost method, the taxpayer had to meet certain conditions, provide an estimated completion date, and file an annual statement.

Rev. Proc. 2023-9 Alterative Cost Method

In releasing Rev. Proc. 2023-9, the IRS and Treasury stated that they recognized certain aspects of Rev. Proc. 92-29 are outdated, place additional administrative burdens on developers and the IRS, and that application of the method to contracts accounted for under the long-term contract method of Code Sec. 460 may be unclear.

The alternative cost method must be applied to all projects in a trade or business that meet the definition of a qualifying project. However, the alternative cost limitation of this revenue procedure is calculated on a project-by-project basis. Thus, common improvement costs incurred for one qualifying project may not be included in the alternative cost method calculations of a separate qualifying project.

The revenue procedure provides definitions including definitions of "qualifying project,""reasonable method," and "CCM contract" (related to the completed contract method). It provides rules for application of the alternative cost method for developers using the accrual method of accounting and the completed contract method of accounting, rules for allocating estimated common improvement costs, and a method for determining the alternative costs limitation. The revenue procedure also provides examples of how its rules are applied.

Accounting Method Change Required

Under Rev. Proc. 2023-9, the alternative cost method is a method of accounting. A change to this alternative cost method is a change in method of accounting to which Code Secs. 446(e) and 481 apply. An eligible taxpayer that wants to change to the Rev. Proc. 2023-9 alternative cost method or that wants to change from the Rev. Proc. 92-29 alternative cost method, must use the automatic change procedures in Rev. Proc. 2015-13 or its successor. In certain cases, taxpayers may use short Form 3115 in lieu of the standard Form 3115 to make the change.

Effective Date

This revenue procedure is effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022.

The IRS announced that taxpayers electronically filing their Form 1040-X, Amended U.S Individual Income Tax Return, will for the first time be able to select direct deposit for any resulting refund. 

The IRS announced that taxpayers electronically filing their Form 1040-X, Amended U.S Individual Income Tax Return, will for the first time be able to select direct deposit for any resulting refund. Previously, taxpayers had to wait for a paper check for any refund, a step that added time onto the amended return process. Following IRS system updates, taxpayers filing amended returns can now enjoy the same speed and security of direct deposit as those filing an original Form 1040 tax return. Taxpayers filing an original tax return using tax preparation software can file an electronic Form 1040-X if the software manufacturer offers that service. This is the latest step the IRS is taking to improve service this tax filing season.

Further, as part of funding for the Inflation Reduction Act, the IRS has hired over 5,000 new telephone assistors and is adding staff to IRS Taxpayer Assistance Centers (TACs). The IRS also plans special service hours at dozens of TACs across the country on four Saturdays between February and May. No matter how a taxpayer files the amended return, they can still use the "Where's My Amended Return?" online tool to check the status. Taxpayers still have the option to submit a paper version of Form 1040-X and receive a paper check. Direct deposit is not available on amended returns submitted on paper. Current processing time is more than 20 weeks for both paper and electronically filed amended returns.

"This is a big win for taxpayers and another achievement as we transform the IRS to improve taxpayer experiences," said IRS Acting Commissioner Doug O’Donnell. "This important update will cut refund time and reduce inconvenience for people who file amended returns. We always encourage directdeposit whenever possible. Getting tax refunds into taxpayers’ hands quickly without worry of a lost or stolen paper check just makes sense."

The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework released a package of technical and administrative guidance that achieves clarity on the global minimum tax on multinational corporations known as Pillar Two. Further, it provides critical protections for important tax incentives, including green tax credit incentives established in the Inflation Reduction Act. 

The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework released a package of technical and administrative guidance that achieves clarity on the global minimum tax on multinational corporations known as Pillar Two. Further, it provides critical protections for important tax incentives, including green tax credit incentives established in the Inflation Reduction Act. Pillar Two provides for a global minimum tax on the earnings of large multinational businesses, leveling the playing field for U.S. businesses and ending the race to the bottom in corporate income tax rates. This package follows the release of the Model Rules in December 2021, Commentary in March 2022 and rules for a transitional safe harbor in December 2022. The guidance will be incorporated into a revised version of the Commentary that will replace the prior version.

Additionally, the package includes guidance on over two dozen topics, addressing those issues that Inclusive Framework members identified are most pressing. This includes topics relating to the scope of companies that will be subject to the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules and transition rules that will apply in the initial years that the global minimum tax applies. Additionally, it includes guidance on Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Taxes (QDMTTs) that countries may choose to adopt.

"The continued progress in implementing the globalminimum tax represents another step in leveling the playing field for U.S. businesses, while also protecting U.S. workers and middle-class families by ending the race to the bottom in corporate tax rates," said Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy Lily Batchelder. "We welcome this agreed guidance on key technical questions, which will deliver certainty for green energy tax incentives, support coordinated outcomes and provide additional clarity that stakeholders have asked for."

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

Republicans’ 2017 overhaul of the tax code created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income (QBI), subject to certain limitations, for pass-through entities (sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies, or S corporations). The controversial QBI deduction—also called the "pass-through" deduction—has remained an ongoing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), enacted at the end of 2017, created the new Section 199A QBI deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, under current law the QBI deduction will sunset after 2025. In addition to the QBI deduction’s impermanence, its complexity and ambiguous statutory language have created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

The IRS first released much-anticipated proposed regulations for the new QBI deduction, REG-107892-18, on August 8, 2018. The proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2018. The IRS released the final regulations and notice of additional proposed rulemaking on January 18, 2019, followed by a revised version of the final regulations on February 1, 2019. Additionally, Rev. Proc. 2019-11 was issued concurrently to provide further guidance on the definition of wages. Also, a proposed revenue procedure, Notice 2019-7, was issued concurrently to provide a safe harbor under which certain rental real estate enterprises may be treated as a trade or business for purposes of Section 199A.

Wolters Kluwer recently interviewed Tom West, a principal in the passthroughs group of the Washington National Tax practice of KPMG LLP, about the Section 199A QBI deduction regulations. Notably, West formerly served as tax legislative counsel at the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy. This article represents the views of the author only and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Wolters Kluwer: What is your general overview of the revised, final regulations for the Section 199A Qualified Business Income (QBI) or "pass-through" deduction?

Tom West: I think it is admirable that Treasury and IRS were able to publish these final regulations so quickly and address so many of the comments and questions that the proposed regulations generated. I think they realized how important this particular package was to so many taxpayers for the 2018 filing season and, while questions obviously remain, having these rules out in time to inform decisions for this year’s tax returns is helpful. In particular, the liberalized aggregation rules and the additional examples regarding certain specified service trades or businesses (SSTBs) are the most consequential in my mind.

Wolters Kluwer: What should taxpayers and practitioners keep in mind in consideration of relying on either the proposed or final regulations for the 2018 tax year?

Tom West: I have to imagine that when choosing between the two, for most taxpayers the final regulations will ultimately provide the better result. The ability to aggregate at the entity level, which was only provided in the final regulations, may be a key consideration for those taxpayers with more complicated or tiered structures. That said, I do think taxpayers need to be careful in their aggregation modeling because you are going to be stuck with your aggregation once you’ve filed. It may be that some taxpayers wait on getting locked into a particular aggregation and continue to study the new rules—and even wait on additional guidance that may be coming. However, it may be important to note that the final regulations provide that if an individual fails to aggregate, the individual may not aggregate trades or businesses on an amended return—other than for the 2018 tax year.

Wolters Kluwer: How is the removal of the proposed 80 percent rule regarding specified service trades or businesses (SSTBs) from the final regulations likely to impact certain taxpayers?

Tom West: First of all, I think the removal of this rule is a demonstration of two important dynamics. One, the critical importance of the engagement of taxpayers in the comment process, and, two, the government’s willingness to listen and adapt in their rule-making. I don’t know if there are particular industries or taxpayers who will be impacted, but I do know that the change is a very logical and appropriate one, and logic doesn’t always prevail in these processes, so I’m happy to give the regulators credit when it does.

Wolters Kluwer: Which industries may have been helped or hindered by the final regulations with respect to SSTB rules?

Tom West: I’m not sure specific industries were helped, but the biggest positive in terms of the SSTB final rules is the carryover from the proposed regulations of the treatment of the skill or reputation provision. Had Treasury and the IRS gone in a different direction, there was a risk of that provision swallowing the rest of the 199A regime—not to mention how much more subjective the already sometimes difficult SSTB determinations would have become.

Wolters Kluwer: Are there any lingering, unanswered questions among taxpayers or practitioners that particularly stand out when determining what constitutes SSTB income?

Tom West: I think many taxpayers who have both SSTB and non-SSTB activities were hoping for more clarity, either in rules or examples, on how to acceptably segregate business lines or on when (or if) certain activities are inextricably tied together. There are also still lingering questions regarding when a trade or business is an SSTB—particularly in the field of health.

Wolters Kluwer: Were there any surprises in the final regulations?

Tom West: I don’t know if I’m surprised, knowing the concerns that led them to the decisions they made, but the fact that Treasury and IRS held the line on some of the SSTB-related rules is notable. I’m thinking specifically of the so-called "cliff" effect of the de minimis rule and the fact that owners of certain kinds of SSTB businesses, e.g., sports teams, are not allowed to benefit from the Section 199A deduction.